The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration cites decreasing bicyclist fatalities in the United States over the past several decades as evidence of improved bicycling safety. However, with users possessing a diverse range of tolerances, purposes, and socio-demographics, bicycle safety is an important yet complex problem, one that does not have a simple yes/no answer. To gain a better understanding, we need to take a variety of perspectives. Traditional bicycle safety analyses take a transportation engineering perspective by using distance-based exposure metrics or those based on the number of trips. But there are other perspectives – such as public health (using population) and transportation planning (using bicycle participation) – that could provide us with a fuller picture. This paper applies four measures of bicycling exposure to take a broad, interdisciplinary perspective on bicycling safety to answer the question of whether bicycling is actually getting safer and, if so, for whom. We first explore age differences with respect to the direction and magnitude of bicyclist fatality rates in the United States between 1985 and 2017. We then investigate whether any safety benefits are shared equally among commuters and recreational riders.Using fatality data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and exposure data from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), the American Community Survey (ACS), the U.S. Census, and the National Sporting Goods Association (NSGA) – a relatively novel approach to measuring exposure through a comprehensive national bicycling participation survey – we derived trends of age-specific bicyclist fatality rates and corresponding confidence intervals for children and adults. We also compare exposure to fatality outcomes by deriving Pearson's correlation coefficients. This is the first research to provide a longitudinal, age-specific statistical analysis of bicycle fatality rates using these four exposure metrics.Results suggest that overall declines in bicycle fatality rates have been primarily driven by a sharp decline in child bicyclist fatalities while adult bicycle fatality rates have generally trended upwards (especially for the general population) or remained stagnant (for commuters). This work adds to the understanding of bicyclist safety and gives direction to future research regarding the importance of considering age and exposure sources.


    Access

    Download


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Is bicycling getting safer? Bicycle fatality rates (1985–2017) using four exposure metrics


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2020




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    Unknown




    Spatial Information for Safer Bicycling

    Loidl, Martin | Springer Verlag | 2016


    Safer junction design encouraged bicycling in Gothenburg

    Leden, L. / Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) / Transportation Research Board et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997


    Understanding preferences for bicycling and bicycle infrastructure

    Noland, Robert B. / Laham, Maria Luz / Wang, Sicheng | Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2023


    Bicycling and bicycle facilities research problem statements

    National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, USA | TIBKAT | 1988