This study integrates the Unified Theory of Technology Acceptance and Use (UTAUT) and Status Quo Bias (SQB) theories and draws on survey data covering nine dimensions: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, individual innovation, transition costs, sunk costs, inertia and resistance to use. The aim is to explore the underlying reasons and disparities that influence people's adoption of MaaS from both a facilitator and inhibitor perspective. To mitigate the confounding effect of group heterogeneity on the MaaS acceptance mechanism, the latent class clustering method was employed to naturally categorize respondents into three distinct groups: MaaS avoiders, wanderers and enthusiasts. A structural equation model was then developed to delineate the path of influence of users' intention to use and to contrast the differences in path coefficients between the different groups. The results show that individuals who are most dependent on public transport are not necessarily the most willing to use MaaS, while those who have used car-sharing services are more likely to adopt MaaS. It also highlights that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to promoting MaaS adoption, as different groups of people have different preferences, needs and concerns about the service. MaaS avoiders are predominantly middle-aged and older individuals with lower incomes, whose reluctance to switch stems from the associated transition costs, which create inertia. To encourage this group to adopt MaaS, operators should develop a gradual and user-friendly transition plan that minimizes complexity and addresses potential challenges such as unfamiliarity with the system and resistance to service changes. Conversely, MaaS wanderers’ willingness to engage with the service is strongly influenced by social influence and performance expectancy. Operators can increase their social media presence and raise awareness of the practicality of MaaS, helping to build an early customer base. In addition, the innovative mindset of MaaS enthusiasts plays a key role in their willingness to adopt the service, although operators must also be vigilant about privacy concerns and the risk of data breaches. Overall, this study enriches our understanding of the factors that shape MaaS adoption and provides actionable insights for improving services across different market segments.
Who are MaaS avoiders, wanderers or enthusiasts and what drives their intentions to adopt MaaS?
2025
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
RIWA-Maas actualiseert Maas-memorandum
British Library Online Contents | 2002
Arbeitsgruppe Hochwasser Maas (AHM). Aktionsplan Hochwasser Maas
HENRY – Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW) | 2002
|Springer Verlag | 2021
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1925
Wiley | 2021
|