The evaluation experiment was conducted using three groups. The experimental group received a written pretest, judgment ground and flight training, a written posttest, and an observation flight at the completion of the training. The flight control group received only the post-training observation flight. The academic control group received the written pretest and posttest along with the experimental group. The resulting data indicated statistically significant differences between the performance of experimental and control group subjects. This was true both in acquisition of judgment concepts as measured by written tests and in the skills performance as measured during the observation flights. Two limitations to the judgment program's generalizability are the relative homogenity of the subjects and the compressed nature of the training time utilized. The associated volumes of the document are Volume II - Student Manual, and Volume III-Instructor Manual. (Author)


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Pilot Judgment Training and Evaluation. Volume 1


    Contributors:
    J. I. Berlin (author) / E. V. Gruber (author) / C. W. Holmes (author) / P. K. Jensen (author) / J. R. Lau (author)

    Publication date :

    1982


    Size :

    98 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    Pilot Judgment Training and Evaluation. Volume II

    J. I. Berlin / E. V. Gruber / C. W. Holmes | NTIS | 1982


    Pilot Judgment Training and Evaluation. Volume III

    J. I. Berlin / E. V. Gruber / C. W. Holmes et al. | NTIS | 1982


    Private Pilot Judgment Training in Flight School Settings

    A. E. Diehl / L. F. Lester | NTIS | 1987


    Pilot Judgment - An Operational Viewpoint

    Babcock, G. L. / Stone, R. B. / Edmunds, W. W. | SAE Technical Papers | 1983