HH-53C Category II evaluation to obtain data for the Flight Manual. The Flight Manual power required to hover was 2 to 7% higher than test data. Flight Manual specific range data were accurate at recommended cruise, but were up to 10% higher than test data at the higher airspeeds. Rotor blade compressibility effects resulted in up to a 5% increase in power required. Rotor blade compressibility was most significant during level flight when advancing blade-tip Mach numbers as high as 0.95 were obtained. Power required increased as much as 38% as advancing blade-tip Mach number was varied from 0.76 to 0.94. During level flight (below 38,000 pounds and 5,000 feet density altitude), maximum airspeed was limited by either the up collective pitch stop or by the advancing blade-tip Mach number, rather than the aircraft airspeed redline, engine power, or any engine/torque limitations. The HH-53C exhibited positive static stability for all flight conditions except for a neutral or slightly negative longitudinal stability at approximately 35 KCAS for level flight and partial power descent. With the automatic flight control system (AFCS) on, it was stable about all axes.
Category II Performance and Flying Qualities Tests of the HH-53C Helicopter
1970
23 pages
Report
No indication
English
Aircraft , Helicopters , Performance(Engineering) , Flight testing , Instruction manuals , Hovering , Low altitude , Level flight , Yaw , Pitch(Motion) , Roll , Flight control systems , Stability , Control sticks , Airspeed , Rotor blades(Rotary wings) , Payload , Aircraft landings , Turning flight , Gas turbines , Temperature , Human factors engineering , Hh-53c aircraft , Category 2 tests , H-53 aircraft
UH-1N Category II Flying Qualities Evaluation
NTIS | 1971
|UH-1N Category II Flying Qualities Evaluation
NTIS | 1972
|Effects of stick dynamics on helicopter flying qualities
NTRS | 1990
|