As of today, no definitive work on space power theory, comparable to the writings of Clausewitz, Mahan, Mitchell (and others in their respective fields), is recognized by military theorists. Though most preliminary space power writing in the United States has centered on space as a logical extension of air power theory (if for no other apparent reason than the organizational location of most space forces within the U.S. Air Force), such treatment is akin to early Army characterizations of aircraft as a tool of the artillery or signal corps, restricted to supporting ground operations. While space is certainly a unique operational setting that has yet to be fully exploited, it shares many characteristics with the sea as an arena for commerce, transport, observation and conflict. In fact, because of the distances involved, the importance of constantly safeguarding the free flow of global commerce (e.g. information) in both peace and war, and the more or less permanent basing of key civil and military assets in orbit, space power, missions and responsibilities have many analogs to the sea. Therefore, one would do well to consider first the earlier work of sea power theorists, specifically A.T. Mahan, when attempting to develop a theory of space power and to develop strategies for space control.
Mahan's Elements of Sea Power Applied to the Development of Space Power
2000
15 pages
Report
No indication
English
Thermoelectric Elements in Space Power Systems
AIAA | 1961
|Space nuclear power applied to electric propulsion
NTRS | 1989
|Space nuclear power applied to electric propulsion
Tema Archive | 1989
|The Space Campaign: Space-Power Theory Applied to Counterspace Operations
Online Contents | 2004
|Letters - Space Power Development
Online Contents | 2000
|