Results of flutter tests on some simple all-movable-control-type models are given. One set of models, which had a square planform with double-wedge airfoils with four different values of leading- and trailing-edge radii from 0 to 6 percent chord and airfoil thicknesses of 9, 11, 14, and 20 percent chord, was tested at Mach numbers from 0.7 to 6.86. The bending-to-torsion frequency ratio was about 0.33. The other set of models, which had a tapered planform with single-wedge and double-wedge airfoils with thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 percent chord, was tested at Mach numbers from 0.7 to 3.98 and a frequency ratio of about 0.42. The tests indicate that, in general, increasing thickness has a destabilizing effect at the higher Mach numbers but is stabilizing at subsonic and transonic Mach numbers. Double-wedge airfoils are more prone to flutter than single-wedge airfoils at comparable stiffness levels. Increasing airfoil bluntness has a stabilizing effect on the flutter boundary at supersonic speeds but has a negligible effect at subsonic speeds. However, increasing bluntness may also lead to divergence at supersonic speeds. Results of calculations using second-order piston-theory aerodynamics in conjunction with a coupled-mode analysis and an uncoupled-mode analysis are compared with the experimental results for the sharp-edge airfoils at supersonic speeds. The uncoupled-mode analysis more accurately predicted the flutter characteristics of the tapered-planform models, whereas the coupled-mode analysis was somewhat better for the square-planform models. For both the uncoupled- and coupled-mode analyses, agreement with the experimental results improved with increasing Mach number. In general, both methods of analysis gave unconservative results with respect to the experimental flutter boundaries.
Aerodynamic Effects of Some Configuration Variables on the Aeroelastic Characteristics of Lifting Surfaces at Mach Numbers from 0.7 to 6.86
1961
52 pages
Report
No indication
English
Engineering Index Backfile | 1961
|