GAO reviewed the controversy over whether the Navy's major surface combatant ships should be all nuclear powered, all conventionally powered, or a mix of both. Nuclear ships are more capable but cost more and their relative cost-effectiveness cannot be measured because Navy analysts cannot quantify many benefits of nuclear power. The Congress, in reviewing Navy shipbuilding plans for surface combatant ships, should be cognizant that buying only conventional ships will maximize naval firepower; buying only nuclear ships will provide mobility and greater freedom from logistics support; and buying a mix is a third option providing, to varying degrees, the advantages and disadvantages of the all-nuclear and all-conventional options.


    Access

    Access via TIB

    Check availability in my library


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Nuclear or Conventional Power for Surface Combatant Ships: Department of the Navy


    Publication date :

    1977


    Size :

    38 pages


    Type of media :

    Report


    Type of material :

    No indication


    Language :

    English




    Marginal Cost Factors for Surface Combatant Ships

    J. S. Howell / C. Graham | NTIS | 1976



    Fireman aboard modern combatant ships

    Rascher, G.J. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1956


    Ring laser gyro navigator for surface combatant ships

    Fulfrost, J. / Checco, W.J. | Tema Archive | 1984