This research examines the relationships between aircrew compliance with procedures and operator errors. The data for this analysis were generated by reexamination of a 1976 experiment in full mission simulation conducted by Dr. H. P. Ruffell Smith (1979) for the NASA-Ames Research Center. The character of individual operators, the chemistry of crew composition, and complex aspects of the operational environment affected procedural compliance by crew members. Associations between enumerated operator errors and several objective indicators of crew coordination were investigated. The correspondence among high operator error counts and infrequent compliance with specific crew coordination requirements was most notable when copilots were accountable for control of flight parameters.
An analysis of aircrew procedural compliance
Symposium on Aviation Psychology
1981-01-01
Miscellaneous
No indication
English
Desk top trainer: transfer of training of an aircrew procedural task
Tema Archive | 1983
|Procedural Intentional Non-Compliance (PiNC)
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|