The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between and the effects of hard and soft safety verifications. Initially, the terminology should be defined and clarified. A hard safety verification is datum which demonstrates how a safety control is enacted. An example of this is relief valve testing. A soft safety verification is something which is usually described as nice to have but it is not necessary to prove safe operation. An example of a soft verification is the loss of the Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) casings from Shuttle flight, STS-4. When the main parachutes failed, the casings impacted the water and sank. In the nose cap of the SRBs, video cameras recorded the release of the parachutes to determine safe operation and to provide information for potential anomaly resolution. Generally, examination of the casings and nozzles contributed to understanding of the newly developed boosters and their operation. Safety verification of SRB operation was demonstrated by examination for erosion or wear of the casings and nozzle. Loss of the SRBs and associated data did not delay the launch of the next Shuttle flight.
Hard and Soft Safety Verifications
30th International System Safety Conference (ISSC) ; 2012 ; Atlanta, GA, United States
2012-08-06
Conference paper
No indication
English
Hard and Soft Safety Verifications
NTIS | 2012
|NTRS | 2012
|Modelisation et verifications comportementales. Behavioural modelling and verifications
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Electrical System Design Fundamentals and Verifications
Wiley | 2018
|Vibration modelling and verifications for whole aero-engine
Online Contents | 2015
|