Although well-established and used countless times successfully in support of certifying many different aircraft, there are still aspects of the safety assessment process commonly used in aviation which can be improved.

    A lot of the methodology and the techniques used in aviation safety are applicable to other industries, including space. This paper highlights the good, the bad and the ugly of aviation safety based on the authors’ experience and makes proposals for lessons learned, the principles of which, can be read across to any domain. The complexity of today’s aviation programs is increasing, with the greater reliance on software and complex electronics and the greater number of work-sharing partners.

    This means it is more important than ever before to take a pro-active approach and review the now-traditional safety assessment techniques / methods in order to maximize confidence, effectiveness and efficiency.


    Access

    Check access

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Safety in Numbers? (Lessons Learned From Aviation Safety Assessment Techniques)


    Contributors:

    Published in:

    Space Safety is No Accident ; Chapter : 28 ; 235-242


    Publication date :

    2015-01-01


    Size :

    8 pages




    Type of media :

    Article/Chapter (Book)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English




    Lessons Learned System for Aviation Safety Oversight

    Eghbali, Gholamhossein | Online Contents | 2008


    "Free lessons" in aviation safety

    Rose, Andrew | Online Contents | 2004


    “Free lessons” in aviation safety

    Rose, Andrew | Emerald Group Publishing | 2004


    The Role of Lessons Learned in the System Safety Cycle for Commercial Aviation

    Werner, P. / Reising, L. / System Safety Society (U.S.) | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006


    Aircraft Fire Safety Lessons Learned

    Dorney, H. / System Safety Society (U.S.) | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006