Defining a clear, comprehensive, and non-overlapping set of assessment criteria is a crucial step in multi-criteria analysis processes. Although criteria are typically developed based on planning objectives, there currently exists no standard procedure for conducting this exercise when both transportation and wider sustainable development goals need to be considered jointly. Based on research applying the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis approach to the case of a high-speed rail project in the UK, this paper presents a framework and a replicable stakeholder involvement process for selecting, defining, and naming assessment criteria to be used in sustainable transport appraisal (STA). The framework consists of a set of systematic guidelines and considerations for producing a coherent list that addresses known cognitive biases and can be understood by a broad range of stakeholders. A further practicable outcome of the research is a comprehensive list, developed using this framework, of 28 transport assessment criteria encompassing direct project impacts, indirect societal impacts, and environmental impacts. This list can serve as a starting point for planners wishing to conduct MCA-based STA. One key take-away from this research is the emphasis on an inclusive, interactive, and iterative approach for defining sustainable transport assessment criteria.
Developing Assessment Criteria for Sustainable Transport Appraisal
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board ; 2672 , 3 ; 104-117
2018-10-10
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Setting the weights of sustainability criteria for the appraisal of transport projects
British Library Online Contents | 2015
|Setting the weights of sustainability criteria for the appraisal of transport projects
DOAJ | 2015
|Enhancing Appraisal Methods to Support Sustainable Transport and Land Use Policies
DOAJ | 2009
|Sustainable Transport Appraisal: A Literature Review and Implications for Policy Makers
Springer Verlag | 2025
|