The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with FHWA, compared predicted abutment scour depths, computed with selected predictive equations, with field observations collected at 144 bridges in South Carolina and at eight bridges from the National Bridge Scour Database. Predictive equations published in the 4th edition of Evaluating Scour at Bridges (Hydraulic Engineering Circular 18) were used in this comparison, including the original Froehlich, the modified Froehlich, the Sturm, the Maryland, and the HIRE equations. The comparisons showed that most equations tended to provide conservative estimates of scour that at times were excessive (as large as 158 ft). Equations also produced under-predictions of scour, but with less frequency. Although the equations provide an important resource for evaluating abutment scour at bridges, the results of this investigation show the importance of using engineering judgment in conjunction with these equations.
Evaluation of Abutment Scour Prediction Equations with Field Data
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board ; 2025 , 1 ; 118-126
2007-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Evaluation of Abutment Scour Prediction Equations with Field Data
Online Contents | 2007
|Abutment Scour Countermeasures: A Review
HENRY – Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW) | 2002
|Pier and Abutment Scour-New Laboratory Data
HENRY – Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW) | 2002
|Upper Bound of Abutment Scour in Laboratory and Field Data
Transportation Research Record | 2016
|Design Estimation of Abutment Scour Depths
HENRY – Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute (BAW) | 2006
|