Severe traffic congestion often occurs at intersections of high-volume traffic arteries. To reduce this congestion, innovative intersection designs such as the single-point urban interchange (SPUI), center-turn overpass (CTO), and echelon interchange (EI) have been implemented. This paper introduces a new type of intersection, the two-level signalized intersection (TLSI), which improves the efficiency of intersection operations under a wide variety of traffic conditions. The paper compares the TLSI with other innovative intersection types. Unlike the SPUI, CTO, or EI, the TLSI provides for complete separation of east–west and north–south traffic. The TLSI also enables the use of directional separation and leading, lagging, or overlapping lefts on both upper and lower levels. Simulation results indicate that, compared with these other innovative intersection types, the TLSI has the shortest delay times in most evaluation scenarios as well as the least sensitivity to variations in traffic volume. However, the TLSI shows significant delay when traffic volumes on the major and minor roads are vastly different.


    Access

    Download

    Check availability in my library

    Order at Subito €


    Export, share and cite



    Title :

    Two-Level Signalized Intersection


    Additional title:

    Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board


    Contributors:


    Publication date :

    2008-01-01




    Type of media :

    Article (Journal)


    Type of material :

    Electronic Resource


    Language :

    English



    Two-Level Signalized Intersection

    Shin, Eon Kyo | Online Contents | 2008


    Safety Based Signalized Intersection Level of Service

    Fuquan, Pan / Jian, Lu / Qiaojun, Xiang et al. | ASCE | 2008


    Safety Based Signalized Intersection Level of Service

    Pan, F. / Lu, J. / Xiang, Q. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008


    User Perceptions of Signalized Intersection Level of Service

    National Research Council (U.S.) | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005