A comparative study was conducted to investigate the performance and cost benefits of future engine concepts for subsonic strategic cruise missile propulsion. Technology advancements were projected for component efficiencies, materials and bearing lubrication. Engine configurations studied were an advanced simple cycle (conventional) turbofan and a recuperated turbofan. Results showed the two engines require virtually the same size missile to fly the designated mission. However, there was lower life cycle cost for the advanced simple cycle turbofan engine.
Engine studies for future subsonic cruise missiles
1986-06-01
Conference paper
No indication
English
Springer Verlag | 2004
|CRUISE Missiles Electronic Warfare Simulation
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|Cruise missiles: Slow but deadly
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1984