Some space missions require a nuclear‐power source to generate electrical power to meet mission objectives. At present, the nuclear‐power source is an assembly of modular heat sources called the general purpose heat source (GPHS) modules. Each module comprises graphite shells designed to protect iridium‐alloy clads which serve as the primary containment shells for the radioactive, heat‐producing material. In the course of launching the space vehicle to perform its mission the nuclear heat source may be exposed to severe accident environments. One particular environment is a primary impact event where individual GPHS modules impact hard surfaces at speeds in the range of 50 meters per second or more. Tests have shown that some clads may be breached in particularly severe impacts and release a small fraction of their contents. This paper presents an empirical model for predicting essential ingredients for assessing the risk associated with primary impact events. The ingredients include: clad failure probability, release fraction of clad contents, characterization of the released material in terms of particle‐size distribution and a means to estimate uncertainty in the prediction process. The empirical model focuses on the deformation of the clads and their capability to withstand deformation without breaching, measured by ductility. The basic criterion used to estimate all ingredients is called “negative margin”. The procedure for estimating risk factors entails calculation of clad distortion by, e.g. hydrocode simulation, and high‐strain‐rate ductility of the iridium alloy. Negative margin is a linear combination of distortion and ductility. Regression equations derived from test data are used to calculate the clad failure probability and the fractional activity release as functions of negative margin. The mass‐based particle‐size distribution is calculated as a function of release fraction. Cumulative uncertainty in this computing process is evaluated using sequential uncertainties in each step implicit in the regression analyses. The overall process is well suited to the Monte Carlo method of risk assessment. The outcome of each history in which clad failure is predicted is a mass fraction of particles in each group. The group‐wise source terms are then used to estimate individual and population doses.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Negative‐Margin Criterion for Impact‐Response Prediction


    Beteiligte:
    Anderson, Denton (Autor:in) / El-Genk, Mohamed S. (Herausgeber:in)

    Kongress:

    SPACE TECH.& APPLIC.INT.FORUM-STAIF 2006: 10th Conf Thermophys Applic Microgravity; 23rd Symp Space Nucl Pwr & Propulsion; 4th Conf Human/Robotic Tech & Nat'l Vision for Space Explor.; 4th Symp Space Coloniz.; 3rd Symp on New Frontiers & Future Concepts ; 2006 ; Albuquerque, New Mexico (USA)


    Erschienen in:

    AIP Conference Proceedings ; 813 , 1 ; 230-243


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    20.01.2006


    Format / Umfang :

    14 pages





    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch



    Negative-Margin Criterion for Impact-Response Prediction

    Anderson, D. / American Institute of Physics | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006



    Nonparametric Maximum Margin Criterion for Face Recognition

    Qiu, X. / Wu, L. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005


    Face Recognition by Stepwise Nonparametric Margin Maximum Criterion

    Qiu, X. / Wu, L. / IEEE | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005


    Criterion to Estimate Optimum Lateral Static Stability Margin

    Lee, Brian / Zaichik, Larisa / Yashin, Yury et al. | AIAA | 2007