A rule violation leading to a traffic conflict involving a vehicle and at least one agent in real-time driving scenarios, simulation, re-simulation or other application is determined to be the fault of the vehicle by determining whether the situation was “reasonably foreseeable,” determining whether the at least one agent is a vulnerable road user (VRU) and determining whether the at least one agent violated a higher priority rule than the rule violated by the vehicle. In an embodiment, on-vehicle decisions are based on a rulebook with a priority structure that accounts for responsibility and determines an “initiator” of the traffic conflict based on whether the vehicle or the at least one agent was the first to violate a rule and the first to violate a higher priority rule.
DISCERNING FAULT FOR RULE VIOLATIONS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FOR DATA PROCESSING
19.10.2023
Patent
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DISCERNING FAULT FOR RULE VIOLATIONS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FOR DATA PROCESSING
Europäisches Patentamt | 2023
|DISCERNING FAULT FOR RULE VIOLATIONS OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FOR DATA PROCESSING
Europäisches Patentamt | 2025
|False discrimination of rule violations for autonomous vehicles for data processing
Europäisches Patentamt | 2025
|Real-time violations and safety monitoring system on autonomous vehicles
Europäisches Patentamt | 2022
|