The safety validation of automated driving for SAE level 3 and higher is still an unsolved issue. While it is generally assumed that an automated driving system should be at least as safe as a human driver, the proof of safety is currently not feasible applying approaches that are accepted for validation today. This paper gives an overview of existing approaches of safety validation from the stakeholders' perspective. Subsequently, the approaches are structured systematically, thus highlighting the simplifications they suffer from. The advantages and drawbacks of each approach are summed up. It is concluded that the issue of safety validation cannot be “solved”, as in proven mathematically with absolute certainty. The goal of the international community needs to be to design the safety validation based on state-of-the-art approaches and then examine acceptance of these approaches. The acceptance needs to be examined from all stakeholders based on the identified pros, cons, and simplifications. Hence, several risk-handling strategies are introduced to deal with the uncertain safety level resulting from necessary simplifications.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff prüfen

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen

    Bestellung bei Subito €


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    Evaluation of Different Approaches to Address Safety Validation of Automated Driving


    Beteiligte:


    Erscheinungsdatum :

    01.11.2018


    Format / Umfang :

    599685 byte





    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Elektronische Ressource


    Sprache :

    Englisch




    Model-based safety validation of the automated driving functio highway pilot

    Beglerovic, Halil / Ravi, A. / Wikström, N. et al. | Springer Verlag | 2017


    Systematic Validation for Automated Driving

    Ebert, Christof / Weyrich, Michael / Lindemann, Benjamin | Springer Verlag | 2021



    Validation of Automated Driving Functions

    Schilling, Ruben / Schultz, Torsten | Springer Verlag | 2016