Objective (1): Provide regulators with a methodology for development of airworthiness requirements for certification of UAS. (a) Rationale: a comprehensive methodology does not currently exist to support development of regulation for certification of UAS. Regulation is essential to enable routine access to the NAS. (b) Approach: (1) assess existing approaches and classification schemes for deriving acceptable means of compliance to airworthiness requirements. (2) investigate a service-based approach to classification of UAS. (3) conduct comparative analysis of different methodologies. (4) work with FAA to determine best approach and conduct case study. (5) participate in regulatory/standards organizations developing safety and performance requirements for UAS. Objective (2): Provide regulators and industry with hazard and risk-related data to support criteria for UAS type design. (a) Rationale: There is presently little UAS specific data (incident, accident, and reliability), especially in a civil context, to support risk assessment and development of standards and regulation. (b) Approach: Identify gaps in existing data, provide measured data as needed, and formulate recommendations by: (1) evaluating UAS incident/accident data collection efforts and determining additional support necessary for regulation. (2) assessing UAS-specific hazards and risks. (3) evaluating need for reliability data for UAS-unique systems, components and subsystem, and determining additional measurement requirements. (4) developing guidance and best practices for UAS type design.
Certification
2010
16 pages
Report
Keine Angabe
Englisch
Online Contents | 1998
|Wiley | 2013
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 1991
|NTRS | 2010
|Certification produits et (ou) certification d'entreprise
Online Contents | 1996
|