Twelve instrument-rated general aviation pilots each flew two scenarios in a motion-base simulator. During each flight, the pilots verbally estimated their workload every three minutes. Following each flight, they again estimated workload for each flight segment and also rated their overall workload, perceived performance, and 13 specific factors on a bipolar scale. The results indicate that time (a priori, inflight, or postflight) of eliciting ratings, period to be covered by the ratings (a specific moment in time or a longer period), type of rating scale, and rating method (verbal, written, or other) may be important variables. Overall workload ratings appear to be predicted by different specific scales depending upon the situation, with activity level the best predictor. Perceived performance seems to bear little relationship to observer-rated performance when pilots rate their overall performance and an observer rates specific behaviors. Perceived workload and performance also seem unrelated.


    Zugriff

    Zugriff über TIB

    Verfügbarkeit in meiner Bibliothek prüfen


    Exportieren, teilen und zitieren



    Titel :

    The reliability and validity of flight task workload ratings


    Beteiligte:
    Childress, M. E. (Autor:in) / Hart, S. G. (Autor:in) / Bortolussi, M. R. (Autor:in)

    Erscheinungsdatum :

    01.01.1982


    Medientyp :

    Aufsatz (Konferenz)


    Format :

    Keine Angabe


    Sprache :

    Englisch


    Schlagwörter :


    Effect of Task Modality on Dual-Task Performance, Response Time, and Ratings of Operator Workload

    Scerra, V.E. / Brill, J.C. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012




    Workload indices: physiological measures versus subjective ratings

    Veltman, H. / Gaillard, A. / Van Breda, L. et al. | British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997


    The Research on Task Unit Workload of Civil Aircraft Flight Operation

    He, Xueli / Ding, Lin / Miao, Chongchong et al. | Springer Verlag | 2017