The 2005 railroad chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina, killed “only” nine people, but it illustrated the difficulties of achieving adequate capacity to handle no-notice evacuation for hazardous materials incidents. This research uses Graniteville as a case study to highlight needs for building capacity in evacuation capabilities and transportation recovery. Rail operational concepts emerged, such as the need for positive train control and automatic warning technology. The local community faced several challenges, including a lack of public understanding of how to react to a chlorine spill (even though chlorine traversed the town daily), public necessity for basic transportation to work after the evacuation, and a need for documentation of transportation infrastructure to facilitate recovery. Finally, evacuation issues arose, such as how to determine whether to shelter in place or evacuate, what routes would protect or harm people given different hazardous materials and how they behave in a spill, and the role of transportation professionals in working with emergency responders to manage evacuation. Experience and lessons learned from Graniteville can help define a national research agenda for the transportation requirements of no-notice and hazardous-materials evacuation.
Train Wreck and Chlorine Spill in Graniteville, South Carolina
Transportation Effects and Lessons in Small-Town Capacity for No-Notice Evacuation
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board ; 2009 , 1 ; 130-135
01.01.2007
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
EDITORIAL - Security train wreck ahead?
Online Contents | 2004
Monitoring a chlorine spill from a train derailment
Tema Archiv | 1981
|Online Contents | 1997
Engineering Index Backfile | 1946